Skip to content
Turnlark
← All events
Debate1v1 (2v1 or 2v2 at some tournaments)

Big Questions Debate

One-on-one debate over deep questions where science, philosophy, and religion intersect. Built for lay judges, with a season-long resolution.

Time
5 min constructives · 4 min rebuttals · 3 min closing speeches
Prep
3 minutes per debater
Format
1v1 (2v1 or 2v2 at some tournaments)

Round structure

Constructives (5 min each)

Aff then Neg present prepared cases — definitions, framework, and core contentions.

Question segments (3 min × 2)

Both debaters alternate asking and answering — once after constructives, once after rebuttals.

Rebuttals (4 min each)

Direct clash on the central disagreements.

Consolidation & Rationale (3 min each)

Collapse to the core question, weigh worldviews, and give the judge a reason to circle your side.

What judges look for

  • Clear engagement with the actual big question
  • Arguments a non-specialist can follow
  • Honest treatment of scientific and philosophical sources
  • Direct clash instead of parallel lectures
  • Composure and clarity in question segments

Ballot criteria

ArgumentationCritical

Quality of reasoning on the core question.

ClashCritical

Direct engagement and weighing of worldviews.

AccessibilityHigh

Clarity for a lay judge; jargon translated.

Question segmentsMedium

Pointed questions, composed answers.

Practice tips

  1. Steelman the other side's best argument and answer it in your case.
  2. Translate every technical concept into a one-sentence plain explanation.
  3. Drill question segments — asking pointed questions is a skill of its own.
  4. Collect concrete examples (experiments, history, thought experiments) for both sides.

Common mistakes

  • Reciting philosophy names instead of making arguments
  • Ignoring the question segment as 'dead time'
  • New arguments in consolidation or rationale
  • Debating definitions all round instead of substance

Sample topics / sparks

  • Resolved: Objective morality exists.
  • Resolved: Humans are primarily driven by self-interest.
  • Resolved: Mathematics was discovered, not invented.

Drills for this event

First principlesPhilosophy of scienceAccessible clashQ&A
62 results
↑↓navigate↵openEscclose